Home Opinion After Doha Strikes, Can Gulf States Still Trust US Security Guarantees?
Opinion

After Doha Strikes, Can Gulf States Still Trust US Security Guarantees?

Share
Share

The Israeli airstrikes on Doha mark not just a dangerous escalation in the Gaza war but also a profound rupture in the credibility of the United States across the Gulf region. For decades, Washington has projected itself as a security guarantor and mediator, balancing its strategic ties with Israel against its partnerships with key Arab states. But by either tacitly approving or failing to prevent Israeli strikes inside Qatar, a U.S. ally hosting the largest American air base in the Middle East, Washington has signaled to Gulf leaders that its commitments are conditional, selective, and expendable.

For Gulf states, this moment raises urgent questions: If Israel can target Hamas negotiators in the heart of Doha without facing consequences, what stops future violations of sovereignty in Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, or Muscat? The airstrikes have shattered the assumption that American presence alone is enough to deter Israeli adventurism or guarantee regional stability. Instead, the U.S. now appears unable, or unwilling, to restrain Israel, even when such actions undermine its broader alliances.

Qatar’s immediate response has been to rally support through the Arab-Islamic summit, projecting defiance and solidarity. But the wider Gulf calculus is more complex. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Oman face a strategic dilemma: whether to double down on U.S. security ties despite declining trust, or to hedge by deepening defense and economic partnerships with China, Russia, and regional players like Turkey and Iran.

The Israeli strikes in Doha may well be remembered as a turning point. They have not only emboldened Israel to act unilaterally but also pushed Gulf capitals to rethink the costs of alignment with Washington. If U.S. credibility continues to erode, Gulf states could accelerate efforts toward a post-American security architecture — one that might prioritize regional military pacts, greater reliance on non-Western powers, and a recalibration of normalization with Israel itself.

For now, the Gulf is watching Washington’s next move. The question is whether the U.S. still has the political will or the leverage — to restore trust, or whether the Israeli strikes on Doha mark the beginning of a historic shift in the region’s geopolitical order.

Share

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Don't Miss

Iran calls Pakistan-Saudi defense deal a step toward a ‘regional security alliance’

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Wednesday voiced strong support for the newly signed defence pact between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, calling it the...

Trump Faces Diplomatic Pressure as Allies Recognize Palestinian State

UNITED NATIONS: Growing frustration with Washington’s handling of the Gaza war spilled into the UN General Assembly this week, as key US allies...

‘World Is Falling Apart,’ Says Trump in Fiery UN Critique

UNITED NATIONS: US President Donald Trump delivered a fiery address to the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday, railing against climate change policies,...

Related Articles

Pakistan–Saudi Defence Pact: A Partnership of Necessity and Trust

The signing of the Pakistan–Saudi Arabia defence pact is not just a...

An Opinion on the Doha Arab-Islamic Summit: Solidarity Without Substance—A Moment to Seize or a Missed Opportunity?

The recent emergency summit in Doha brought together nearly sixty Arab and...

Strike on Qatar Exposes U.S. and Israeli Hypocrisy in the Arab World

The recent Israeli strike on Qatari soil has sent shockwaves across the...

The Upcoming Changing World and South Asia

As the geopolitical chessboard shifts once again in the 21st century, South...